Maternal & Child Health Links:
Research, Education, Extension & Technology
Volume V
This newsletter is written by and transmitted electronically from
Karen L. Konzelmann, National Program
Leader--Maternal and Child Health, Cooperative State Research, Education
and Extension Service, USDA. It is intended for Cooperative
Extension System educators in the fields of nutrition, human health
and nutrition research.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
USDA to Focus on Breast-feeding
What Makes Human Milk the "Gold Standard?"
Breast-feeding Hospitalized Low Birth Weight
Infants
Fat Profile Differences between Human Milk and Infant
Formula
Cholesterol: Another Difference between
Human Milk and Infant Formula
Increase in Breast-feeding in U.S.
Barriers and Contraindications to Breast-feeding
Identified
General Nutrition Guidelines for Breast-feeding
How Do You Know A Breast-Fed Baby Is Getting Enough
Milk?
Economics Involved-Dollars Saved
Role of Education in Breast-feeding
Resources Available
Electronic Connections
Journal Articles Worth Noting
Subscribe Online for the electronic version of MCH LINKS
USDA to Focus On Breast-feeding
Recently Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman announced a year-long
campaign by federal and state WIC programs to promote breast-feeding
by WIC mothers and to support all women who choose to breast-feed.
The theme of the promotion is "Loving Support Makes Breast-feeding
Work" and is the result of a cooperative agreement between
Food and Consumer Services (FCS) of USDA and Best Start Social
Marketing, Inc. The goals of this special effort include encouraging
WIC participants to begin and continue breast-feeding; to increase
referrals to WIC clinics for breast-feeding support; to increase
general public acceptance and support for breast-feeding; and to
provide support and technical assistance to WIC professionals in
promoting breast-feeding.
Initially 10 locations will pilot the special promotion--Iowa,
Arkansas, Nevada, California, New Jersey, West Virginia, Ohio, New
York, Mississippi and the Chickasaw Indian Tribal Organization.
Special resource materials, media packets and training will be available.
The media phase of the project officially began during World Breast-feeding
Week, August 1-7, 1997.
What Makes Human Milk the "Gold Standard?"
Research conducted over the last several decades has established
that breast milk provides the ideal food for infants to both nourish
them and to protect them from illness. Human milk is a unique
mixture of exactly the right amount of fatty acids, lactose, water,
amino acids, vitamins, minerals and other components necessary for
digestion, brain development and growth.
Benefits to the Infant: Breast-fed infants have fewer ear infections
and less frequent incidence of diarrhea, respiratory illness, allergies
and urinary tract infections than formula-fed infants. Scientists
have also discovered that infants fed human milk have improved neural
development, cognitive ability and visual acuity compared to formula-fed
infants. The sucking action involved in breast-feeding strengthens
the muscles of the babies' entire oral cavity in a way that enhances
facial muscle and helps with the correct formation of teeth.
Human milk appears to provide some protection from non-insulin dependent
diabetes, Crohns' disease and lymphoma later in life. Recent
studies have shown breast-fed babies have fewer doctor and hospital
visits than their formula-fed cohorts. Taken together, these studies
indicate that medical costs would be significantly lower in breast-fed
infants than in formula-fed infants.
Benefits to the mother: Typically, breast-feeding allows the mother
to recover from childbirth more quickly, experience less postpartum
hemorrhaging, and less anemia. Breast-feeding also enhances
the maternal-infant bonding process. Recent studies also indicate
women who breast-fed their infants may have less risk of osteoporosis
and breast cancer.
Reference: JADA 1993; 93:468-469
Breast-feeding Hospitalized Low Birth Weight
Infants
In the last few years, the nutritional benefits of human milk for
the preterm infant, in terms of protein digestion, fat absorption,
lactose digestion and amino and fatty acid patterns have been recognized.
Human milk provides unique protection from such diseases as septicemia
and necrotizing enterocolitis which is especially important in high-risk
infants.
The lipids in human milk make up 50% of the calorie content and
are structured in a way that promotes digestion and absorption--an
ideal combination for an infant that needs to gain weight.
However, since the amount of fat in human milk varies between individual
mothers and from feeding to feeding, a strategy was needed to ensure
that milk with the highest fat content was fed to the infant.
Richard Schanler, M.D., professor of pediatrics at Baylor College
of Medicine and lactation support program counselors at Texas Children's
Hospital, devised a procedure to separate or fractionate the milk
from each mechanical expression into two portions--foremilk and
hindmilk. Foremilk is the initial milk of each feeding.
Hindmilk follows after several minutes of nursing and is 2 to 3
times higher in fat content. Studies have shown lacto-engineering
strategies that use only the hindmilk to feed the infants are successful
in increasing the body weight gain of the preterm infant.
Since these infants are not able to suck at the breast like a term
infant, mothers pump their milk to be placed in feeding tubes for
their infants.
To meet the very high nutritional needs of the premature infants,
Dr. Schanler has studied various methods to fortify human milk.
These fortifiers contain additional protein and minerals necessary
for the optimal growth of the premature infant. The investigators
involved in these studies have observed positive reactions from
the mothers of the high-risk infants. By providing their own
milk, they know they are participating in the care of their infants
and giving them the best start possible under difficult circumstances.
With the combination of lactation support and fortification strategies,
neonatologists can ensure even the low-birth-weight infant receives
the extra protection of human milk.
References: Clinics in Perinatology 1995; 22:207-222, Journal
of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition 1994; 18:474-477
Fat Profile Differences Between Human Milk and
Infant Formula
Fat is a key nutrient, particularly for a growing infant.
There is some evidence that preterm and full-term infants fed human
milk have better cognitive development and visual acuity than their
formula-fed cohorts. One of the differences may be the composition
of the fat in human milk. Human milk contains two long chain fatty
acids, arachidonic acid (AA) and docohexaenoic acid (DHA), that
are critical to normal brain development, eyesight and growth.
Formula fed infants must make these fatty acids from their precursors
alpha-linolenic (ALA) and linoleic acids(LA).
Two Baylor College of Medicine scientists, William C. Heird, M.D.,
professor of pediatrics, and Craig L. Jensen, M.D., assistant professor
of pediatrics, have conducted several studies of the role of DHA
in infant growth and development. These investigators have
studied both term and preterm infants to determine their ability
to make the important fatty acids, to discover optimal amounts for
supplementing infant formula and have also looked at various sources
of DHA to supplement the diets of breast-feeding mothers.
Key study findings: both term and preterm infants can convert linoleic
and alpha linolenic acids into AA and DHA and the ability to do
so does not seem to increase with age as had previously been thought;
infants fed a high intake of ALA, or a low LA/ALA ratio, have more
DHA in their blood but do not see any better than infants fed lower
intakes; infants fed a high intake of ALA do not grow as well as
infants fed a lower intake; none of the four ALA intakes (or ALA/LA
ratios) studied result in DHA or AA levels similar to breast-fed
babies. Additionally, studies in term infants suggest that
DHA status in early infancy might be associated with a modest neurodevelopment
advantage at 12-15 months of age.
Because the amount of AA & DHA varies widely in human milk,
Heird and Jensen supplemented the diets of breast-feeding mothers
with high-DHA egg, fish oil capsules and algae-derived DHA to determine
if they could increase the level of DHA in the mothers' blood and
also in the blood of the infant. Measurements indicated that
supplementation effectively increases the DHA content of milk and
also the babies' plasma. Whether supplementation benefits
the infant has not yet been determined.
The scientific community is currently debating whether to recommend
supplementing infant formula with these fatty acids. Supplementation
is a complex issue involving the safe and adequate amounts of the
fatty acids, the best sources of the fatty acids and the ratios
between the fatty acids.
References: Current Opinion in Lipidology 1997, 8:12-16; J Pediatr
1997, 131:200-209
Cholesterol Content: Another Difference
between Human Milk
and Infant Formula
Cholesterol is an essential component of cell membranes and is
critical for brain development and production of the myelin sheath,
which protects nerves and nerve endings. There have been many studies
about the way dietary cholesterol is regulated in adults, but none
in infants. William W. Wong, PhD., professor of pediatrics at Baylor
College of Medicine, used stable isotopes to determine the effects
of dietary cholesterol on cholesterol synthesis in breast-fed and
formula-fed infants.
The total nutrient intake from either human milk or infant formula
was measured in infants between 4 and 5 months of age. Formula-fed
infants consumed more energy, fat and protein than breast-fed infants.
However, breast-fed infants were found to consume 5 times
more cholesterol than the formula-fed infants. Formula-fed
infants produced cholesterol 3 times faster than their breast-fed
counterparts but still had much less cholesterol in their blood.
Current casein-based, or cows milk-based, formulas have less than
25% of the cholesterol found in human milk. Infant formulas with
a soy base contain even less cholesterol.
Dr. Wong found the greater cholesterol intake of the breast-fed
infants was associated with elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol concentrations
but not HDL-concentration levels. In adults, LDL is a risk
factor for heart disease, but its role in infants is different.
Since the breast-fed infants were consuming more cholesterol than
was needed for growth, cholesterol synthesis in infants may be efficiently
managed by a down-regulating mechanism when infants are challenged
with high intakes of dietary cholesterol. These findings lead
to questions about whether infants who receive formulas low in cholesterol
and respond by making more cholesterol might be 'programmed' to
have problems with high cholesterol levels later in life.
Infants fed human milk with its abundant supply of cholesterol instead
might experience a protective effect. Animal studies have
shown a beneficial effect of feeding cholesterol in early infancy
on cholesterol homeostasis in later life. Further research will
increase our understanding of the long-term effects of large intakes
of cholesterol during infancy.
Reference: J Lipid Res 1993: 34:1402-1411
Increase in Breast-feeding in U.S.
More women are choosing to breast-feed their infants and are doing
so for a longer period of time according to data from the Ross Laboratories
Mothers' Survey. Comparing the rates from 1989 and 1995, the
initiation of breast-feeding increased more than 14% (from 52.2%
to 59.7%). There was also a 19.3% increase in the rate of
breast-feeding at 6 months of age (from 18.1% to 21.6%). In
addition to the increases noted, there was an increase among groups
that historically have not had high rates of breast-feeding.
Those groups include: women who are African Americans, less than
25 years of age, in the lowest income group, no more than grade
school educated; women who had low-birth-weight babies; women who
work full time away from home; and women who participated in the
WIC program. Typically, white or Hispanic women over age 25,
with more education, higher incomes, not working away from home
and who had infants of normal birth weight were most likely to breast-feed.
Reference: Pediatrics 1997; 99(596)
Barriers to Breast-feeding Identified
With all the advantages of breast-feeding, why do some women choose
not to do so? Focus group interviews with women across all
socioeconomic groups and in various parts of the country list two
major reasons for choosing not to breast-fed: embarrassment and
lack of support from family and friends. Additional personal
barriers identified include a number of misconceptions and misunderstandings
including the necessity to eat an ideal diet that does not include
some of their favorite foods. Other concerns involve the possibility
of pain when an infant nurses and a lack of confidence in their
ability to provide all the milk an infant needs.
In addition to personal barriers, system barriers are mentioned
such as: receiving conflicting information; being in a hospital
that routinely supplements all infants with formula or water; and
mothers and babies being kept in separate rooms rather than together.
Contraindications--There are several specific circumstances in
which breast-feeding is not indicated: when the mother is undergoing
chemotherapy for cancer; is HIV-positive; or uses illegal drugs.
Many medications are safe even when breast-feeding, but each drug,
even over-the-counter ones, should be specifically discussed with
a physician or a pharmacist.
Reference: Lawrence, R.A. 1994. Breast-feeding: A Guide For
the Medical Profession, 4th Ed.
General Nutrition Guidelines for Breast-feeding
Mothers
The American Dietetic Association offers the following recommendations
for nursing women:
- Drink plenty of liquids--at least 8 cups daily
- Eat a variety of foods--from each of the food groups
- Eat at least three meals daily and don't skip breakfast
- Limit foods that are high in sugar and fat and low in nutrients
- Eat about 500 calories more each day than typically eaten before
pregnancy
- Avoid dieting to lose weight rapidly
Reference: Breast-feeding: Nature's Best for You and Your Baby,
American Dietetic Association, 1993
How Do You Know A Breast-Fed Baby Is Getting
Enough Milk?
Signs of sufficient intake after the first few days of life include:
- 8 or more feedings each day
- 6 wet diapers each day
- 2-4 stools each day
- Clear urine
Infant weight loss guidelines:
- 5-7% from birth weight is common
- Greater than 10% indicates inadequate intake and possible dehydration
- Baby should regain birth weight within two weeks
Reference: AJDC 1991; 145:917-921
Economics Involved, Dollars Saved
A recent benefit-cost study was done on the Colorado WIC program
to determine whether infants who were breast-fed for six months
while being enrolled in WIC would be associated with a reduction
of Medicaid costs during that period of time. The findings
were as follows: compared with formula-feeding, breast-feeding each
infant enrolled in WIC saved $161 after consideration of the formula
manufacturers' rebate; a Medicaid savings of $112 per infant was
realized by the breast-feeding cohort; and pharmacy costs for the
breast-feeding cohort were approximately 50% lower than costs for
the formula-feeding infants.
Other studies have compared the number of work days lost by parents
due to the illness of their infant and the cost of treatment for
those illnesses between breast-fed and formula-fed infants.
Findings include: each ear infection cost $60-$80 and resulted in
1-2 days off work unless ear tube surgery was required; in that
case the cost was from $400-$1650 and resulted in 2-3 days off work;
bronchitis or pneumonia cost $60-$80 if hospitalization was not
required; if hospitalization was required, the cost was $4600-$5000
and resulted in 2-7 days away from work.
References: JADA 1997; 97:379-385; Breast-feeding Works For
Working Women, Texas Bureau of Nutritional Services
Role of Education in Breast-feeding
Almost every article about breast-feeding mentions the importance
of education for the mother and her family members. The timing
of that education appears to be best when it is done early in the
pregnancy. That allows time for the woman to think about feeding
options and to secure more information.
Experienced educators know how personal the decision is to breast-feed
and underscore the importance of providing accurate information,
answering questions as fully as possible and then respecting and
supporting the woman's decision--whichever choice she makes.
Resources Available
-
Title: Comprehensive Management and Training Guide for an In-Home
Breast-Feeding Support Program.
Target Audience: Professionals and paraprofessionals who work
with pregnant and lactating women of all ages and levels of education,
but especially targeted to limited resource audiences.
Topics: 3 manual set including all the resources needed to manage
the program plus train a staff. Includes complete teaching materials--slides,
overheads, and masters of all handout materials. Contains the
latest information, written in conjunction with
scientists at the Children's Nutrition Research Center.
Cost: $180 per complete set, also available separately Information:
contact Susan Baker, M.Ed., North Carolina State University, ssbaker@amaroq.ces.ncsu.edu or
919-515-9126.
-
Title: Colorado Breast-feeding Update: A newsletter for Health
Care Professionals
Topics: A wide range of current issues in breast-feeding
Cost: $15.00 per year by subscription--4 issues
Order from: Colorado Breast-feeding Task Force, Center for Human
Nutrition UCHSC, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Box C225, Denver, CO 80262
-
Certified lactation consultants have extensive training and
experience in facilitating and sustaining breast-feeding.
Local WIC offices and local La Leche League chapters have information
and support for breast-feeding women and their families.
Electronic Connections
Journal Articles Worth Noting
- Motil K, Kertz B, Thotathuchery M. Lactational performance
of adolescent mothers shows preliminary differences from that
of adult women. Journal of Adol Health 1997; 20:442-449.
This article outlines the differences in milk production, milk
composition and lactational behavior of adolescents.
- Visness C, Kennedy K. Maternal employment and breast-feeding:
findings from the 1988 national maternal and infant health survey.
Amer J Public Health 1997; 87:945-950. Article describes
findings that low rates of breast-feeding are not due to women
working away from home, but returning to work is associated with
earlier weaning.
- Kalkwarf H, Specker B, Bianchi D, Ranz J, Ho M. The effect
of calcium supplementation on bone density during lactation and
after weaning. N Eng J of Med 1997; 337:523-528. Discusses
temporary bone mineral loss during lactation and its reversal
after weaning.
- Hoey C, Ware J. Economic advantages of breast-feeding in an
HMO setting: a pilot study. Amer J of Managed Care 1997;
3:733-737. Describes cost savings of breast-feeding over bottle-feeding
from an industry point of view.
The purpose of this communication is to provide updates on relevant
research and resources for education programming. Please let
me know if this meets your needs or if you have ideas for topics
to include. In order to facilitate sharing materials across
the states, information about new materials will be included if
details are forwarded to me. A specific electronic mail address
has been established by Baylor College of Medicine
for responses. It is MCHLINKS@bcm.tmc.edu
The Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service,
USDA, is the Federal partner of the state and territory land grant
universities in their research, education, and extension missions.
The USDA prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of
race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, marital or family status. Mention of a product,
service, or curriculum does not constitute endorsement by USDA or
CES unless the curriculum citation specifically says "recommended
for use in all States and Territories".
|
|